A judge presents a possible violation at a party in Tecnocasa and investigates a young woman from Zaragoza who denounces him.

A judge presents a possible violation at a party in Tecnocasa and investigates a young woman from Zaragoza who denounces him.

La titular del Juzgado de Instrucción número 3 de Santander decided to archive it denuncia por una presunta violation con sumisión química submitted by una joven de Zaragoza durante una convención real estate de franchises de Tecnocasa celebrada en la capital cantabria. But not only that, tal y como solicitaba la defense, la magistrada ha deterido que se inicie una The investigation was punished by the sentence of investigation punishment.. Any favor may be declared for the purpose of research.

La joven, de 22 años, assured his day that on the night of June 14 to 15, after partying with other participants of the convention, he was the victim of a violation of the law with a chemical substance. The hotel room in Santander confirmed that donde se alojada Otro, mantuvien relaciones sexs consentidas y que fue ella quién lo invitó a ir a su hotel porque estaba justo enfrente al pub donde se habian reunido. Un amigo de la joven avaló su version, mientras que una decena de testigos la contradecían. Almost any defense may be required.

Talks, la mujer relató que sobre la la mujer relató que sobre la 1.00 estaba bebiendo un cubata en el bar y lo siguiente que recuerda es despertarse a las 8.00 a las oír cómo se puerta de su habitación al salir. She told me that she didn't know who it was and that she noticed that she was naked because she was sleeping in pajamas, that she had vaginal pain and bite marks on her wrists and wrists. Esa misma mañana se ducho, vistió y bajó a desayunar y no contó nada porque, explicó, se sentía muy confundida. There is no consent to attend the reception of the previous hotel accompanied by a man.

La jueza appreciates contrasts

Ten pages later, the judge highlights the possible contradictions the appellant may face.

“As appreciated, the appellant's behavior in the hours and days after the fact is not consistent with what he has shown in his complaints and statements, as he not only brags in public about maintaining his relationship with the investigator, but recalling what happened, sino que bebió más spirt del que dice, y only ese día sino al día siguiente, haciendo referencia a otras sustancias, alguna de las cuales la tenía la propia denunciationante in su poder, e inclulasoones including people. , detalle que mencionamos especially not because of the fact that the investigation had intimate relations with other people, but because he denied it in the presence of the court, which makes his testimony appear in court,” he said.

But the judge also refers to police investigations. “The police in charge of investigating the facts prove that there are a number of contradictions in the statements of the complainant, for example, she says that she saw the investigation when she went to the beauty center for the first time after the fact, and that's when she saw it. recorded it and identified it, y hablando con dicho centro dicen que no conocen a esta chica ni ese día tenía cita con ellos,” he said.

Instructors can conduct investigations where possible to prevent a drunken whistleblower report. His lawyer, Carmen Sánchez Herrero, announced that he would repeat the auto de archivo.