- Recurring alert: only 40%
- The mechanism that distinguishes the most dangerous storms
- Warning of the Community of Madrid
- AEMET shows the responsibility of governments
- Interim decision
La Agencia Española de Meteorología Without any warning for temporary advertising DANA, which destroyed dozens of municipalities in the province of Valencia, dejando 215 muertos. Fuentes de la AEMET matizan a Confidential Digital que decartan esta possibility “for now”, y apuestan por los baremos ya estáblados, que advirtieron de riesgo “extremo” last Tuesday in different municipalities of the Comunidad Valenciana.
The body of the hand low risk levels: verde, amarillo, naranja y rojo, siendo este último el más grave. Sin embargo, no warning except: en lo que va de año, The agency has announced 20 red warnings for rains in all countries. Como revela el recuento oficial al que ha tenido acceso ECD.
Recurring warning: only 40%
Register at AEMET, digital, reflective adelantados Just over 40% of alerts sent in 2024 were red alerts. La AEMET launches this warning for meteorological events: “No habits, non-exceptional and no new risks for la población” muy alto”. In this case, the recommendation is accepted “medidas prevention” and follow the instructions of the authorities. “No viajar, salvo que strictlyamente necesario”, recuerdan desde la Agencia.
The mechanism that distinguishes the most dangerous storms
Estas cifras que from the house This is not an exceptional alarm. china más bien recurrente. Therefore, it is necessary to open the doubt Create a new one to alert for possible major atrocities. Otras cassiones de alerta roja, los estragos han sido minimos compared to the climate disaster that rocked Valencia in the early hours of October 30.
Warning of the Community of Madrid
For example, it was the storm that caused the Community of Madrid last September send a notification of maximum danger to all mobile phones located in risk zones of the region. Unfortunately, la lluvia, los daños fueron solo materiales y reducidos a pocas zonas del territorio.
Entons, political representatives even Vox pidió water ban criticism. That experience Influence on the de facto president of Valencia, Carlos Mazon, par retrasar el aviso por la gota fría, too much information ECD.
AEMET shows the responsibility of governments
Las razones que llevan allorismo and no modificar los level de alerta es clara: es responsabilidad de los gobiernos determinar cuán grave puede llegar a resultar un aviso. The agency assures that its powers are limited warning about weather conditions and adverse events; lanzando también Citizenship recommendations, however no detailed assessment.
“Observation and monitoring systems of the State Meteorological Agency (AEMET) and hydrographic confederations Let Hagar prophesy, but my son Competent with civil defense materials Those responsible for evaluation affections about the population and the environment, de emitir los avisos que correspondent y de adopter las medidas de protección más adequadas en cada caso”, confirmation.
La Agencia guarantees weather conditions different effect if produced in a depopulated zone or pegados al cauce de un río The policy is not appreciated by the authorities. “Una nevada ya una tormenta It does not represent the same risk in a highland area or in the center of a large city. Aunque los avisos meteorologicos sean el mismo, adopted las medidas por protección civil serán diferentes,” they concluded.
Interim decision
Body, sin embargo, Note that this is a temporary decision. “Por ahora no lo contemplamos”, However confirm AEMET no rechazan estudiarlo en las next semanas.
You may also like
-
Eduardo Inda asks the public to call Ok Diario “medio de disinformación”.
-
Spain's national colleges and zones are under water
-
Aemet will review its performance during DANA to confirm that no errors have been made
-
Discover the Mercadona product that transforms your home cleaning
-
Refusal to withdraw from Zaragoza academy